Monday, August 21
Friz Freleng-For-All
![](http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3723/1199/320/hastyhare.0.png)
I'm not an animator or an animation scholar, but I love to watch classic cartoons, and sometimes try my hand writing about them. Knowing that writers far more practiced than I can sometimes get their extremities caught in painful, embarrassing traps when trying to reach for analysis of cinematic topics outside their realm of expertise (Mick LaSalle being a recent example) might make me hesitant to write on the form. But, though I'm still in the beginning steps of understanding the animator's craft (a term I use because it parallels the commonly-used "actor's craft", not to imply that animating or acting are unartistic endeavors), I hope I have something to contribute to a discussion of cartoons, if only an expression of my passionate belief that the best are as essential as the acknowledged great works of the cinema.
One of the film critics I most admire, Manny Farber, was among the first non-specialists to treat the Warner Studios' cartoons as an important topic of discussion, with a piece published September 20, 1943 in The New Republic called "Short and Happy." It's a brief, six paragraph article, but it does a good job describing the amoral appeal of the Warner house style in the early 1940s when compared to the growing tendency of Disney (the only cartoon studio to have received widespread critical attention at that time) toward virtuous uplift. In 1941 Preston Sturges had made a similar, if perhaps unintended, critique of Disney's transformation by using scenes of pure slapstick from 1934's Playful Pluto in his Sullivan's Travels as the catalyst for the film director's conversion from would-be educator to entertainer, reversing Disney's path during the period. Farber praised Merrie Melodies for being "out to make you laugh, bluntly, and as it turns out, cold-bloodedly." The problem with his praise in the original article, however, is that it now seems rather misdirected. Repeatedly Farber gives the credit for the cartoons to the producer Leon Schlesinger and not any of the directors to whom we now know he gave relatively free creative reign. This is probably why, by the time "Short and Happy" was placed in the 1971 Farber collection Negative Space, it had been edited to attribute the cartoons' singular qualities to Freleng, Tex Avery, Chuck Jones, and Robert McKimson. But the re-edit causes more problems than it solves, as by bringing McKimson into the equation Farber awkwardly conflates two eras of Merrie Melodie-making: 1940-42, when Jones, Freleng and Avery were directing but McKimson was still an animator, and the period that stretched from 1950 until the early 1960s, when nearly all the studio's cartoons were directed by Jones, Freleng or McKimson. An added paragraph constrasting the directors' styles feels like it belongs in a different piece; it was that paragraph's reference to the 1958 cartoon Robin Hood Daffy that made me feel the need to look up old issues of The New Republic on microfilm.
![](http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3723/1199/320/wabbitwhocametosupper.png)
But here I am, already on the fifth paragraph of this post, and I still haven't gotten around to saying what it is about Freleng that made me want to initiate this Blog-a-Thon in the first place. The above stuff is important, I think, because Farber is a deservedly influential critic, and his damningly faint praise of Freleng's talents in the revised "Short and Happy" has probably held some sway over the many, many readers of Negative Space in the years since its publication. It, or other conventional wisdom like it, certainly held some sway over my own opinions of Warner cartoons when revisiting them as an auteurist-minded adult. I took the genius of Avery and Jones almost for granted, and it was Bob Clampett's extraordinarily distinctive (almost always MOST contorting) style that first caught my attention as something of a "new discovery" for me. But gradually I began to appreciate Freleng more as well, and now I think he among all the Termite Terrace directors most exemplified this original Farber quote, contrasting the studio's artistic method against "insipid realism":
It is a much simpler style of cartoon drawing, the animation is less profuse, the details fewer, and it allows for reaching the joke and accenting it much more quickly and directly: it also gets the form out of the impossible dilemma between realism and wacky humor.
![](http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3723/1199/320/highdivinghare.png)
As Greg Ford notes in his commentary on the Looney Tunes: Golden Collection disc on which this short appears, High Diving Hare has a long set-up. It's true that there is often some gag-light "dead space" in a Freleng cartoon, but at least in the case of this one, the set-up is necessary to build the gag premise that will so pay off in the second half of the cartoon. The premise, for those of you who may not have seen the film before but want to see me overexplain it (I really don't recommend that; please watch it right now or skip to the end of this post where the links to other bloggers are) is that Bugs is presenting a variety show at an Old West Opry House. Yosemite Sam's favorite daredevil Fearless Freep is on the bill, inspiring the diminutive gunslinger to lay down a pile of cash and plop down right in front of the stage. Carl Stalling's musical contribution increases the tension as the camera makes a vertical pan (Paul Julian's background using a perspective effect to simulate a live-action tilt) up the impossibly high ladder to the platform Freep is going to dive off of. But if Sam isn't impatient enough already, he really loses his temper when Bugs interrupts a lengthy introduction to accept a telegram from the weather-delayed diver. Of course, all this set-up isn't to make Sam's anger more believable; with Yosemite you believe his anger from the first cel. It's to create a situation in which Sam doesn't want to just kill Bugs in his usual way, but to motivate him to force Bugs up the ladder to the platform so he'll dive in Freep's place. Freleng and his crew don't have a pair of six-shooters that can make Yosemite climb that ladder himself; they have to construct and draw everything.
![](http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3723/1199/320/highdivinghare2.png)
I'm not going to detail each of the subsequent 8 times Yosemite tries to force Bugs off the diving board and ends up the fall guy himself, but in each iteration of the gag the climb-trick-fall cycle gets briefer than the previous, except for the third, and the ninth and last fall. Sam's third ascent takes a few seconds longer because it's the film's first real break with the rules previously established in the cartoon's exaggerated but thus far logical universe. When he steps out on the board, unable to figure out where Bugs went, the audience is privy to the knowledge that he's standing upside-down on the underside of the board. Or so we think; as soon as Bugs informs Sam that he's the one upside-down, he falls, illustrating the principle that Looney Tunes characters can do anything until they realize they've done something they can't. By falls number seven and eight Freleng leaves the camera trained on the middle of the ladder so that we see a sopping wet Sam climbing up, and soon enough falling down and making a splash, but we aren't shown what Bugs is doing up there to keep Sam's water wheel of torment turning. The moment when we expect to see him fall again, but instead the silence is broken by the sound of sawing, is a hilarious friction between anticipation and surprise. The resolution is perfect because it's simply too easy. When Michael Barrier in Hollywood Cartoons claims that "gags in Freleng's cartoons tend to be of equal weight, so that a cartoon simply stops when its time is up" he either isn't considering High Diving Hare or else he's thinking specifically of big, complicated, finishes like the ones Jones supplies in most of his Road Runner or Sam Sheepdog cartoons. High Diving Hare's "biggest" gag is the first dive, and the others are like ripples on the surface, keeping the laughter generated from the initial splash going and going.
This is all just how I see it. Please feel free to disagree with any or all of my train of thought by leaving a comment below!
Freleng appreciators in the Frisco Bay area will want to know that the Balboa Theatre will be holding a tribute to the director sometime this Fall, including a screening of Ford's 1994 documentary Freleng Frame-By-Frame. (I'll post the precise date when I learn it through the theatre's informative weekly newsletter, available on the theatre website and through e-mail.) In the meantime they're screening a (non-Freleng) cartoon before each showing of Little Miss Sunshine.
Once again, thanks to all the participants in this Blog-A-Thon! If you've written something you'd like me to link, please e-mail me or leave a comment. Here are the links I've collected so far; they'll be updated several times throughout the day:
Adam Koford at Ape Lad.
Akylea at Robots cry too (en Español / in Spanish).
alie at blogalie (en Español / in Spanish).
ASIFA-Hollywood.
Brad Luen at East Bay View.
Brendon Bouzard at My Five Year Plan.
Craig Phillips at Notes From Underdog.
Dave Mackey.
David Germain at david germain's blog.
Dennis Cozzalio at Sergio Leone and the Infield Fly Rule.
Dennis Hyer at Atlantic County Cartoons.
Gir at Gir's room with a moose.
girish.
Harry McCracken at Harry-Go-Round.
J.E. Daniels at the Adventures of J.E. Daniels.
Joe Campana.
Josh at jazz::animated.
Kurtis Findlay Burnaby at animated toast!
Michael Guillen at The Evening Class.
Mondoxíbaro (en galego / in Galician).
Peter Nellhaus at coffee, coffee, and more coffee.
Richard Hildreth at Supernatural, Perhaps -- Baloney, Perhaps Not.
Sean Gaffney.
Stephen Rowley at Rumours and Ruminations.
Steven at The Horror Blog.
Ted at Love and Hate Cartoons.
Thad Komorowski at Animation ID.
Thom at Film of the Year.
Tom Sito at Tom's Blog.
Xocolot (en Español / in Spanish).
UPDATE 8/22/06: Just wanted to point out that Wade Sampson published a MousePlanet piece on Freleng last week in honor of the centennial as well.
Also, thanks to Cartoon Brew, Greencine Daily, La Vanguardia and other sites that spread the word about the Blog-a-Thon. With more than two dozen officially participating sites, I'd call the day an unqualified success!
Comments:
<< Home
Brian, "as soon as Bugs informs Sam that he's the one upside-down, he falls, illustrating the principle that Looney Tunes characters can do anything until they realize they've done something they can't."
That's it! You nailed the very thing that I love about these cartoons: we're in on the joke with Bugs. We know that the gravity-defying dope (Yosemite, Elmer, whoever) is eventually going to realize that the joke is on him, look down, give the camera a quick "Oh no," and plummet to his doom. We know it waaaay before he does. We watch and wait for the stupid sap to figure it out, and once he does we laugh it up with Bugs. We conspirators in Bugs' mania but, best of all, since it's animated we don't even feel the slightest twinge of guilt. :) Great piece and fun blog-a-thon idea.
That's it! You nailed the very thing that I love about these cartoons: we're in on the joke with Bugs. We know that the gravity-defying dope (Yosemite, Elmer, whoever) is eventually going to realize that the joke is on him, look down, give the camera a quick "Oh no," and plummet to his doom. We know it waaaay before he does. We watch and wait for the stupid sap to figure it out, and once he does we laugh it up with Bugs. We conspirators in Bugs' mania but, best of all, since it's animated we don't even feel the slightest twinge of guilt. :) Great piece and fun blog-a-thon idea.
Wow! Brian, what an intense and educated post!
I need a Bugs fix, now! (NOT "Cleopatra" at the Castro!)
I need a Bugs fix, now! (NOT "Cleopatra" at the Castro!)
Brian, I'm really excited to read your post in detail. This was truly a great idea for a Blog-a-Thon. I'll be officially announcing the Robert Aldrich Blog-a-Thon for October. But in the meantime, my Freleng post is finally up. Viva Friz!
Compartiu o seu talento co mundo, nin máis nin menos que non é pouco. In memorian 99 o 100 anos (que máis da) que hai de novo vello?
Hey, let's fix that hyperlink...
http://www.davemackey.com/2006/08/happy-100th-birthday-friz-frelengon.html
http://www.davemackey.com/2006/08/happy-100th-birthday-friz-frelengon.html
Fixed it, Dave! Soory about that.
Thom, one thing particlarly great about the "upside-down" gag is that, because of the visual information Friz has chosen to give us, at first we aren't in on the joke, as you can see from the stills Dave uses in his post. We get it faster than Sam does, though, which makes us anticipate the humor; I think anticipation is an underrated factor in the way humor works. Friz was great at using it in his cartoons.
I love all the participation! Keep the links coming! I only wish my foreign-language skills were stronger! I had no idea I'd be getting so many hits from Spain and other countries. It's great!
Thom, one thing particlarly great about the "upside-down" gag is that, because of the visual information Friz has chosen to give us, at first we aren't in on the joke, as you can see from the stills Dave uses in his post. We get it faster than Sam does, though, which makes us anticipate the humor; I think anticipation is an underrated factor in the way humor works. Friz was great at using it in his cartoons.
I love all the participation! Keep the links coming! I only wish my foreign-language skills were stronger! I had no idea I'd be getting so many hits from Spain and other countries. It's great!
If there was any inherent weakness in "The Wabbit Who Came To Supper," it's that the Warner artists were still trying to find out what made Bugs tick in his first film, "A Wild Hare." But that's no fault of Freleng; at this point we all know that Bugs succeeds as long as his adversaries are clueless.
As Joe Adamson opines about Friz' "High Diving Hare," it's that there is no physical explanation why Bugs' schemes should succeed and his foes' should fail, tying in what Bugs is doing here to understanding "The Force" from Star Wars. Can't argue with that.
As Joe Adamson opines about Friz' "High Diving Hare," it's that there is no physical explanation why Bugs' schemes should succeed and his foes' should fail, tying in what Bugs is doing here to understanding "The Force" from Star Wars. Can't argue with that.
Brian--What a fantastic post....just amazing.
I watched High Diving Hare for the first time this weekend and it was delightful to read your close analysis with it fresh in my mind.
When I mentioned this upcoming event to my friend Doug Cummings a few weeks back, he sent me that Farber quote, which had me pulling out my copy of Negative Space. I agree: his faint praise for Friz is disappointing. (Your Sherlockian microfiche sleuthing just raised the bar for all future blog-a-thons!)
I'm a total animation novice, but this blog-a-thon gave me the perfect pretext to self-curate a Merrie Melodie Marathon. Ironically, the exercise that turned out to be most revelatory was scouring the films closely, forefinger on screen capture trigger. In real time, the films go by so fast that playing them nice and sloooow truly reveals their infinite subtleties and detailed pleasures.
Thanks for proposing this event, Brian. A great success--congratulations!
I watched High Diving Hare for the first time this weekend and it was delightful to read your close analysis with it fresh in my mind.
When I mentioned this upcoming event to my friend Doug Cummings a few weeks back, he sent me that Farber quote, which had me pulling out my copy of Negative Space. I agree: his faint praise for Friz is disappointing. (Your Sherlockian microfiche sleuthing just raised the bar for all future blog-a-thons!)
I'm a total animation novice, but this blog-a-thon gave me the perfect pretext to self-curate a Merrie Melodie Marathon. Ironically, the exercise that turned out to be most revelatory was scouring the films closely, forefinger on screen capture trigger. In real time, the films go by so fast that playing them nice and sloooow truly reveals their infinite subtleties and detailed pleasures.
Thanks for proposing this event, Brian. A great success--congratulations!
Christopher, thanks for sharing your take. I guess that Bugs' motivation for wanting to hang around with Elmer in his house for even the brief legnth of a cartoon is somewhat suspect. But there are so many great gags, whether little throwaways like Bugs dropping his towel coming out of the shower, or "don't go down there, it's dark!", or more monumental laughs like the cross-dressing scene, which I understand was Bugs' first appearance in drag (my mental catalog is not complete enough to confirm or deny). It all helps the Wabbit Who Came to Supper survive Bugs' not-yet-fully-developed characterization, for me.
I'm glad you brought up Joe Adamson, whose book I haven't looked at in a while. I like the idea that it's something like "The Force" that lets Bugs get away with things that his opponents cannot. But if there's no physical explanation, perhaps there's something of a moral explanation why Bugs' schemes work: most of his opponents, Sam included, don't generally scheme at all, and if they do it's usually as a last resort after their usual method, brute force. I think it helps explain his near-universal appeal that Bugs may use violence, but compared to gun-toters like Sam, Elmer, Bugsy & Mugsy, etc. he's a pacifist.
I'm glad you brought up Joe Adamson, whose book I haven't looked at in a while. I like the idea that it's something like "The Force" that lets Bugs get away with things that his opponents cannot. But if there's no physical explanation, perhaps there's something of a moral explanation why Bugs' schemes work: most of his opponents, Sam included, don't generally scheme at all, and if they do it's usually as a last resort after their usual method, brute force. I think it helps explain his near-universal appeal that Bugs may use violence, but compared to gun-toters like Sam, Elmer, Bugsy & Mugsy, etc. he's a pacifist.
..."But if there's no physical explanation, perhaps there's something of a moral explanation why Bugs' schemes work"
Brian,
Is a moral explanation why Bugs' schemes work really the best we can come up with? Bugs is a beliver that might makes right. He'll get what he wants by any means necessary. The toon I watched (Hare Force) saw him use a door, his fists, his feet, and pushing his opponent outside to freeze solid as methods to work out his scheme. Sure he didn't use a gun, but is the use of other weapons besides guns as means to an end any more moral? I don't think I can get behind that. The best we can say is that Bugs is more intellegent. He outsmarts everybody, doesn't he? Who can name a toon where some character outsmarts Bugs?
(I just want to add that I'm so glad that we're discussing Friz/Bugs Bunny in this format, thanks again for sponsoring the 'thon.)
Brian,
Is a moral explanation why Bugs' schemes work really the best we can come up with? Bugs is a beliver that might makes right. He'll get what he wants by any means necessary. The toon I watched (Hare Force) saw him use a door, his fists, his feet, and pushing his opponent outside to freeze solid as methods to work out his scheme. Sure he didn't use a gun, but is the use of other weapons besides guns as means to an end any more moral? I don't think I can get behind that. The best we can say is that Bugs is more intellegent. He outsmarts everybody, doesn't he? Who can name a toon where some character outsmarts Bugs?
(I just want to add that I'm so glad that we're discussing Friz/Bugs Bunny in this format, thanks again for sponsoring the 'thon.)
Who can name a toon where some character outsmarts Bugs?
Well, Avery's Tortoise Beats Hare is a notable one, but it's true there are very few, at least among the ones I've seen in the past five years. (In that period I've seen the great majority of Bugs 'toons, but I have a lot of gaps in the late 50s and 60s).
In cartoons where Bugs doesn't simply rely on his brains to outwit his opponent, is he ever the instigator? In Hare Force he isn't, as I recall. I didn't mean to imply that Bugs is a pacifist even when it comes to defending himself.
And he's not a pacifist at all in some of the wartime cartoons, like one of the ones Richard Hildreth discusses: Bugs Bunny Nips the Nips.
Well, Avery's Tortoise Beats Hare is a notable one, but it's true there are very few, at least among the ones I've seen in the past five years. (In that period I've seen the great majority of Bugs 'toons, but I have a lot of gaps in the late 50s and 60s).
In cartoons where Bugs doesn't simply rely on his brains to outwit his opponent, is he ever the instigator? In Hare Force he isn't, as I recall. I didn't mean to imply that Bugs is a pacifist even when it comes to defending himself.
And he's not a pacifist at all in some of the wartime cartoons, like one of the ones Richard Hildreth discusses: Bugs Bunny Nips the Nips.
Girish, I'm glad you enjoyed it, and were inspired to join the celebration yourself! I love your post and your Freleng Gallery of Sadism- "the Iridescence of Violence" indeed!
Re: Farber. I really love the original article. Practically nobody in 1943 was talking about cartoon directors, only producers (Disney, Fleischer), so the Schlesinger shorthand seems completely understandable. Not every piece of criticism needs to be inflected with the tones of auteurism. By 1971 it was only sensible to give cartoon directors their due, but I wish it had been in a new piece, not a poorly-done graft onto a pre-existing article and passed off like it was written that way in 1943. It actually makes me want to take a look at some more New Republic microfilm rolls and see if there was any rewriting of his live-action film criticism in Negative Space.
The microfilm research is the easy part, actually. Remember that I work in a library. Figuring out the source for the Permian Strata footage for your Blog-A-Thon was a lot harder, and more wholeheartedly satisfying (probably because it didn't involve a measure of disappointment in a critic I admire.)
I didn't watch much Tweety in preparation for this Blog-A-Thon, since I knew I wasn't going to write on him myself (I was also considering Rhapsody in Rivets, the Lion's Busy, and You Oughta Be in Pictures but decided to go with my favorite Bugs/Yosemite matchup in the end). Before I go to bed tonight I plan to watch Putty Tat Trouble so I can discuss it on your and Dennis's sites.
Re: Farber. I really love the original article. Practically nobody in 1943 was talking about cartoon directors, only producers (Disney, Fleischer), so the Schlesinger shorthand seems completely understandable. Not every piece of criticism needs to be inflected with the tones of auteurism. By 1971 it was only sensible to give cartoon directors their due, but I wish it had been in a new piece, not a poorly-done graft onto a pre-existing article and passed off like it was written that way in 1943. It actually makes me want to take a look at some more New Republic microfilm rolls and see if there was any rewriting of his live-action film criticism in Negative Space.
The microfilm research is the easy part, actually. Remember that I work in a library. Figuring out the source for the Permian Strata footage for your Blog-A-Thon was a lot harder, and more wholeheartedly satisfying (probably because it didn't involve a measure of disappointment in a critic I admire.)
I didn't watch much Tweety in preparation for this Blog-A-Thon, since I knew I wasn't going to write on him myself (I was also considering Rhapsody in Rivets, the Lion's Busy, and You Oughta Be in Pictures but decided to go with my favorite Bugs/Yosemite matchup in the end). Before I go to bed tonight I plan to watch Putty Tat Trouble so I can discuss it on your and Dennis's sites.
Many congratulations! , which beautiful blog for this event you give Brian to us, a great success.
I have put a Link next to an image in Perejilpuntocom.
Greetings and thanks! :)
I have put a Link next to an image in Perejilpuntocom.
Greetings and thanks! :)
Thanks everyone for contributing; it's been a fun and productive day but now it's officially over even out here in California. Time for me to put on my Pink Pajamas and go to sleep. Tweet Dreams!
Thanks Brian and Thanks Friz! Best tribute? Watch a particularly hilarious Friz effort from 1941, The Trial Of Mr. Wolf.
I finally had time to participate. Hope people still care! (How can anyone stop caring about Friz!)
http://underdog.typepad.com/wandering_outloud_/2006/08/on_the_friz_fre.html
So many great ones, so little time...
Thanks for doing this Brian!
CP
http://underdog.typepad.com/wandering_outloud_/2006/08/on_the_friz_fre.html
So many great ones, so little time...
Thanks for doing this Brian!
CP
Brian, I don't know what you do or don't know about animation, but your piece is dead on. I think you've got it covered :-) This makes me wish I had a blog, because I would've loved to join in on this one somehow! Good stuff!
Well! Only a year late and 3000 miles short...that's me all over!
But enough about me-just ran across this blog: what a great idea! This is for Friz's 101st (or 102nd...) bday. I only say here that Friz is responsible of four of the funniest-and best constructed-catoons ever: "Bugs Bunny Rides Again" (1948), "High Diving Hare" (1949), "Rabbitson Crusoe," (1956), and "The Pink Phink" (1964). At another time in amother place, I'll tell you what happened when I met him...but again, this is not about me!
But enough about me-just ran across this blog: what a great idea! This is for Friz's 101st (or 102nd...) bday. I only say here that Friz is responsible of four of the funniest-and best constructed-catoons ever: "Bugs Bunny Rides Again" (1948), "High Diving Hare" (1949), "Rabbitson Crusoe," (1956), and "The Pink Phink" (1964). At another time in amother place, I'll tell you what happened when I met him...but again, this is not about me!
frizandi, thanks for the late comment! Made me realize that I let his 101st (or more likely 102nd, or even 103rd) birthday slip by this year without even thinking of him, unfortunately. But earlier this month I did get to see Birds Anonymous and Knighty Knight Bugs on the big screen at the Castro Theatre, and loved them more than ever!
Do tell your story sometime! If not here, please leave a comment to let me know where you eventually do!
Post a Comment
Do tell your story sometime! If not here, please leave a comment to let me know where you eventually do!
<< Home